The Berlin Wall Then and Now
by Edward HudginsNovember 5, 2009 — I first visited
West Berlin was an island of freedom in the middle of a communist country, protected by the occupying powers of the
No-mans-land
But I wanted to see the Wall. In 1961 the Soviet Union, which occupied its part of
At various points along the wall on the West Berlin side stood crosses marking the spots where, on the other side in no-mans-land, those who would not sit quietly and be slaves were gunned down and died in their bids to escape to freedom.
Sterile city
I went into East Berlin through
After some hours there I did what no East Berliner could do. I walked back to
Tear it down
In 1987 Ronald Reagan would stand at that infamous border between freedom and oppression and demand of the Soviet Premier, “Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall!” On November 9, 1989, the wall fell as the communist government of East Germany, like those in the rest of the Soviet bloc, could no longer hold back their subjects’ demands for liberty.
The
The Red army had disintegrated.
Concrete obscenity
The wall was a breathtaking moral obscenity, a concrete manifestation of the philosophy on which it was built. The communists held that the good of society took priority over the interests of selfish individuals. They maintained that individuals must be required to work for society. Of course, the will of “society” was to be divined and carried out by a small ruling elite who would have the exclusive right to force all to serve whether they wanted to or not.
And no one could be allowed to opt out and leave, to escape his duty to serve. The reality of this philosophy was most starkly on display in
Today there are only a few regimes, like
Philosophical walls
We see the philosophy in declarations by American politicians that we all have a duty to serve our community, to put the interests of society ahead of our own interests. But “society” is not some abstraction opposed to individuals. Rather, society is nothing but the flesh and blood individuals who compose it. And the interests of individuals don’t conflict if they deal with one another based on reason and mutual consent. Conflicts arise only when some individuals and groups desire the irrational and the unearned, when they want to extract something for nothing from their neighbors. Conflict most often arises at the point of a gun, whether held by a common criminal, by a pampered interest group, or by government elites.
We see the philosophy in the politicians who think they can run our lives better than we can and who will use the force of government to impose their will on us. Look at almost any major initiative before Congress today.
And we see the philosophy in
The Cold War crystallized the battle between two philosophies, one of individualism and freedom, the other of collectivism and repression. The Soviet bloc collapsed under the burden of its own contradictions and in the face of Western diligence and military might.
Two decades after the fall of the Berlin Wall it is difficult for many young people—and older people who were confused to begin with—to appreciate that the moral philosophy on which the wall was built lives on and threatens us still. Those who value their lives and liberty must tear down that false philosophy lest new walls rise to separate us from our freedom.
--------
Hudgins directs advocacy and is a senior scholar at The Atlas Society, the Center for Objectivism.
For further reading:
*Alan Greenspan, “The Crisis Over
*Edward Hudgins, “Obama and McCain: The Selfless-Driven Interviews.” August 19, 2008.
*Edward Hudgins, “Atlas Shrugged as Prophecy.” The New Individualist, October 2007.
*David Kelley, “The War against Modernity.” Navigator, May 2002.
*William R Thomas, “Altruism - Does being your brother's keeper cause strife?” January 29, 2009.







